SAMSON et DALILA

i have not been an operaphile for many years.

some weeks back, however, i think the met performed this opera by camille st saens. i was overwhelmed by the majesty, the beauty of the music.

i went looking for a cd of the work. found it, today. an EMI CLASSICS reissue. fabulous.

listening to it, i was moved to consider st saens.

there is this great pianist, stephen hough, who performed his complete works for piano and orchestra. a hyperion set. a benchmark.

and then i was taken back to my college years in cambridge. when e power biggs was the master of the organ at the busch-reisinger.

i don't know if the performance is still available, but his version of the st saens organ symphony was a killer.

camille st saens. all too often forgotten. a composer creating great listening pleasure.

tune in.

ENRON

i think i posted some of my observations concerning ENRON some months, years ago.

but in light of the trial verdict, i thought that i would reprise some of the salient aspects of my previous essays.

i had this stockbroker who was very close to the lays. in fact, he and ken's sister, sharon, purchased land together to build their houston dream houses.

he kept encouraging me to buy enron stock. i kept telling him no. finally, one day over lunch in 2000-2001, he really put the arm on me to buy enron. i told him no again. he was so flabbergasted that i would not invest in that company that he challenged me to tell him why i was so opposed to owning enron gilts.

this is what i told him......

1. i worked with the natural gas pipeline companies[northern natural gas, houston pipeline, florida gas] prior to their acquisition by ken lay.

prior to their acquisition by ken lay, these were well-run, well-managed, safety-conscious entities.

after their acquisiton by the ken lay vehicle, enron, all these entities became "raped".

no training of personnel. no sufficiency of personnel.

a national security asset of the usa was being sabotaged, in my view.

2. that view was sharpened by how ken lay re-organized these entities. after merging into enron, they no longer operated in an authoritarian manner. these national security assets became operated by consensus - where the ignorant lowest level mechanic had equal standing with the 30 year supervisor who really knew things.

3. and then there was the enron effort to compel metallurgical labs to fudge analyses. about such critical aspects of their assets as the integrity of their line pipe, their cathodic protection, their welding quality.

i could say so much more. but i shall leave it this way. prior to enron, the natural gas pipeline industry tried to do it honestly, responsibly. enron changed that. after all the other pipeline companies noted the enron "trimming" they all became "trimmers". bad money driving out the good. this is a reagan/clinnton/bushit phenomenon.

4. in 1993, i was invited to russia by gazprom to survey some of their critical pipeline equipment. when i say critical, i mean it this way...if it doesn't work, moscow freezes in the dark.

sometime after my survey, enron took a contract to operate the gas transmission assests of gazprom. coincidentally, they exercised an agreement with argentina to operate their natural gas pipeline assets[gas del estado].

i know that they failed in both ventures. the gazprom project was such a failure. enron hadn't a clue.

for some reason, enron had failed to recognize the control of the mafiyah.

i recall the meeting at enron hq to this day. they were complaining that materials that i supplied them were stuck on the docks of riga. as if this was my problem.

i advised them that the problem didn't originate with me or my outfit...that the problem was theirs. i told them that i suspected that all their materials for their projects were blockaded at riga. much enron stammering. this told me that i had it accurately.

so i went further, i told them that they had failed to recognize the influence of the mafiyah. more stammering. meeting ended.

walking out to the elevator, one of the enron hands took me aside and told me that i had it accurately...but that these were truths that the management of enron would never recognize.

i responded that enron would lose lots of money in these ventures.

some months later, enron abandoned these projects.

these abandonments occurred without much comment in the financial press.

for a later date, i shall discuss enron's energy trading business. suffice it to say, it was a ponzi scheme.

and it was so clearly that. so consider your monies subjected to the wall street gangsters. the gangsters who preferred to look the other way.

scythes and pitchforks, amigos.

burn dc.

GARRICK OHLSSON

ome will recall my revealing the french sony cd's of george szell and the cleveland symphony orchestra playing the beethoven symphonies. and better still, in that collection, leon fleisher playing the beethoven concertos.

so, you know that i care a great deal about artistry.

i love chopin. if you can find these Ohlsson recordings on the arabesque label, seize them.

they are great performances.

BORDERS BOOKS

BORDERS BOOKS....

engaging in deceptive trade practices?

i sure think so.

last weekend, i had some border coupons. ordinarily, i use them to acquire classical cd box sets. but i had one left over, and encountering a book in the history section, the cuba project, i bought it using one of my 20% discount coupons.

when i returned home, i noticed that the pricing barcode was a pressure sensitive label. and it established the price for the book at $29.95. with the dscount coupon, that made my price approximately $24.00.

hmmmmmm.

using my trusty penknife, the one that the reptillians/demtillians will not allow me have on my person or in my carry-on while flying, i removed the borders pricing label. how interesting, the publisher's price for the book appeared to be $24.95.

just for the fun of it, i accessed amazon. amazon noted the list price for this book at $24.95. and they would sell it to me for $15.72. sans sales tax. and because of my prime membership, they would ship it to me ups 2nd day for free.

i returned the book to borders.

after i made that return, i examined other books at that store. seems that borders covers up the publishers' cover-printed barcodes and pricing on everything. and elevates the publisher's list prices.

i strongly recommend that you discontinue shopping at borders for books. unless you care to monkey-wrench the system and remove the border's barcode label prior to your check-out.

still, amazon will beat their prices.

i own no stock in amazon. i am just a bibliophile who hates to be ripped off.

forewarned is forearmed.

TECH DEVOLUTION

modern cell phones.

what a bunch of junk.

i acquired a motorola razr v3 today. as part of an exercise to replace the drop-prone sprint and the 201 vintage, top of the line sprint samsung, which now does glitches unpredictably.

i shall return the motorola bit of junk tomorrow. very unergonomic. no volume. now i have a better understanding of why drivers slow down when on their cellphones - the call is not audible at cruising speed. i find that this phone is not audible at rest.

perhaps the one i was sold is just defective, but i don't think so. i think it is an exemplar of the trend of devolution.

it is a technological trend. for example, i have been owning/driving daimler-benz products since 1973. my fave was a 1986 560sel. a refrigerator of an automobile.
it replaced a 1976 450sel.

i acquired both of them new. loved 'em. straightforward mechanically. very little electronic nonsense.

as old blue was up on 250,000 miles, i ordered the 2000 s500. it arrived. i refused to accept it. principally because of the lcd command system.

i decided to find low mileage pre-electronification benzes. i have acquired some nice ones. all more reliable than the post-2000 models. and much better looking in my view.

and don't even get me started on audiophile cd players.

sell motorola short.

AL FRESCO

or AL DENTE.

but AL KAIDA is a fiction. a nonentity that the bushits created to stir up fear among the populace. so as to stampede them into exhuming joe stalin and lavrenti beria and enthroning those totalitarian gangsters as the chief management officers of the united states of amerika.

i have said this before. and been banished from purportedly progressive boards for saying it. might make one wonder if certain boards aren't pseudopods of the secret state.

why do i introduce this vision again? and why today?

well, i attended the OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE in Houston.

driving in from montgomery county, my driver used the hardy toll road. this toll road runs alongside the mopac trackage. i have mentioned it before. i care to mention it again. what kind of rail cars were idling in the roadbed? and what were the contents?

chemical cars, mostly. with these contents: lpg, gasoline, anhyrous ammonia, molten sulfer, butadience., toluene. you name the hazardous chemical, the combustible chemical, there it was - sitting in the middle of the 4th largest city in the united states.

if there were any terrorists, they could drive down this highway with as weak-sister a weapon as an AR15, hole all these tank cars, and exterminate virtually all the citizens of houston. and this could be done in every urban area all over the usa.

you hear about port security. what about railway security? quite candidly, if there was really a terrorist threat, then all railways should be secured when these chemical freights move on them.

and then, of course, there are the natural gas and products pipelines. exquisitely vulnerable. so many citizens of the usa have such little understanding of the fragility of the infrastructure. that these fragile energy delivery assets go so unsecured tells me that the state knows that there is no terrorism other than the terrorism that it perpetrates.

arriving at reliant center for the OTC conference, i was carrying a briefcase containing some electrical components. components that if viewed by x-ray would have caused me to be taken into a room for more scrutiny.

consider....in this exhibition hall there were the managers, the suppliers of the world's energy industry. AND THERE WAS NO SCRUTINY OF ATTENDEES.

i had expected security similar to what is imposed on airline passengers. NADA!.

this is the eureka moment. when it is finally confirmed that there are no terrorists. that 11/09/01 had no terrorist actors. that it was all state-operated.

because, just consider. anyone could have entered that hall, with a case full of explosives, and exterminated the entirety of attendees...virtually eliminating all the individuals who make oil & gas production happen globally.

my guess is that security was as nonexistent at last years powergen show in las vegas.

no, amigos, when you think on it all, the events of 11/09/01 were a usa falseflag operation. agent provocateur ops. if they were real terrorist actions, chemical trains would have been suspended. trade shows involving the hydrocarbon industry would have imposed a level of security similar to that imposed on airline passengers.

we have been gulled. get our your firebrands. sharpen your scythes. it is time to march on the center of repression. of evil. it is an anti-state known as the district of columbia.

sic semper tyrannis.

AL FRESCO

or AL DENTE.

but AL KAIDA is a fiction. a nonentity that the bushits created to stir up fear among the populace. so as to stampede them into exhuming joe stalin and lavrenti beria and enthroning those totalitarian gangsters as the chief management officers of the united states of amerika.

i have said this before. and been banished from purportedly progressive boards for saying it. might make one wonder if certain boards aren't pseudopods of the secret state.

why do i introduce this vision again? and why today?

well, i attended the OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE in Houston.

driving in from montgomery county, my driver used the hardy toll road. this toll road runs alongside the mopac trackage. i have mentioned it before. i care to mention it again. what kind of rail cars were idling in the roadbed? and what were the contents?

chemical cars, mostly. with these contents: lpg, gasoline, anhyrous ammonia, molten sulfer, butadience., toluene. you name the hazardous chemical, the combustible chemical, there it was - sitting in the middle of the 4th largest city in the united states.

if there were any terrorists, they could drive down this highway with as weak-sister a weapon as an AR15, hole all these tank cars, and exterminate virtually all the citizens of houston. and this could be done in every urban area all over the usa.

you hear about port security. what about railway security? quite candidly, if there was really a terrorist threat, then all railways should be secured when these chemical freights move on them.

and then, of course, there are the natural gas and products pipelines. exquisitely vulnerable. so many citizens of the usa have such little understanding of the fragility of the infrastructure. that these fragile energy delivery assets go so unsecured tells me that the state knows that there is no terrorism other than the terrorism that it perpetrates.

arriving at reliant center for the OTC conference, i was carrying a briefcase containing some electrical components. components that if viewed by x-ray would have caused me to be taken into a room for more scrutiny.

consider....in this exhibition hall there were the managers, the suppliers of the world's energy industry. AND THERE WAS NO SCRUTINY OF ATTENDEES.

i had expected security similar to what is imposed on airline passengers. NADA!.

this is the eureka moment. when it is finally confirmed that there are no terrorists. that 11/09/01 had no terrorist actors. that it was all state-operated.

because, just consider. anyone could have entered that hall, with a case full of explosives, and exterminated the entirety of attendees...virtually eliminating all the individuals who make oil & gas production happen globally.

my guess is that security was as nonexistent at last years powergen show in las vegas.

no, amigos, when you think on it all, the events of 11/09/01 were a usa falseflag operation. agent provocateur ops. if they were real terrorist actions, chemical trains would have been suspended. trade shows involving the hydrocarbon industry would have imposed a level of security similar to that imposed on airline passengers.

we have been gulled. get our your firebrands. sharpen your scythes. it is time to march on the center of repression. of evil. it is an anti-state known as the district of columbia.

sic semper tyrannis.

AMERIKA

what is it about the amerikan media? all controlled by the state? all controlled by zionists?

in the purportedly "legitimate" press[newspapers, television, radio], you will never encounter any truths about the events of 11/09/01.

what you will read, hear, see are artfully crafted fictions.

i have written about some of these fictions extensively. and i may still have some of those essays on a portable hard drive. but i doubt it. i think i had not saved some prior to a major hard drive crash. sigh.

on the other hand, "get me rewrite!"

i want to begin by saying that i do not understand how so many people are unable to cerebrate. and how many accept as truth what the state says.

let us consider just a few of the ways that should cause a sentient individual to question the lies of the state concerning the events of 11/09/01. where to begin? the beginning.......

1. consider a group of earnest terrorists. dedicated to the destruction of the great satan. they have had long-term relations with amerikan intell services. they have family members, and financiers, with long-term relations with the usa. in fact, some of them may have been trained at nas pensacola.

and as danny hopsicker has reported, atta was quite the playboy in venice, florida. and his instructor-employer must have been very well connected to have been caught running lots of cocaine and escaped prosecution. this is an interesting history of atta. principally because the nyt owns the local paper and refrained from doing any investigation into this story[this is the zionist/amerikan intell link - pinch'es dad, punch, was oss and a perfervid zionist]. it should be a matter of great concern to amerikan citizens how the concentration of media ownership allows for the "spiking" of important stories.

anyway, if you were as connected as atta, even marginally as well bank-rolled by the saudis, the mossad, you would never hijack a commercial airliner. you would never accommodate the variable of being denied access to a flight. you would never jeopardize your mission by making a connection. and you would never jeopardize your mission by flying for hours to your target - why would you think that you wouldn't be intercepted and exterminated?

the only reason for the fiction of the hijack story is so that the new amerikan gestapo can monitor/control airline-train travel within the usa. and the devolved/devolving citizenry accepts the imposition of the new totalitarianism.

it must be said: if there were real terrorists, they would never have used hijacking as a part of their scheme. they would have preferred to eliminate the variables. they would have acquired/leased 727's, DC10's. very affordable and very available in 2001. no one would have asked any questions.

they would have rented a hanger at some airport. they would have established a dba as an aircraft customizer. they would have acquired the planes. then loaded them with explosives. and flown them into teterboro, newark on 10/09/01. and if they wanted the WTC, they would have launched and within minutes collided with them. this would have prevented any interception. and would have insured destruction.

but, the question must be raised? why the wtc? this is not a strategic target. it is much like pearl harbor, which was also not a strategic target.

you know, if you were a real terrorist who wanted to injure the great satan, and you had the ability to acquire aircraft and fly them into strategic targets, you would fly them into indian point nuclear power plant and the exxon refinery in linden, nj. that would have shut down the usa. the rupture of the containment of indian point would have been tantamount to chernobyl - vast numbers of deaths from radioactivity and the shut-down of most of the northeast. why would you screw around with the wtc when you could impose that strategic damage?

and you would fly them into the exxon refinery just a few miles further south.

doing these things would have shut-down, destroyed the amerikan east coast.

even if you were foolish enough to energize your plan by incorporating hijackings, if successful in taking control of the airliners, why would you overfly indian point, fail to fly a little bit further south so as to strike exxon's refinery,
and strike a non-strategic target?

recognizing this is the first key to recognizing that the events of that day were part of a usg coup.

2. there is much talk about jet A[kerosene] fires so weakening the structural steel of the towers that they collapsed as if victims of a controlled demolition.

much erroneous information has been foisted on the populace concerning the fires. i have seen so much nonsense. i read somewhere that jet A burns at 1250 F. it doesn't. 850 F.

but more to the point, for those that squirm to defend the bushit version of the day, it should not be forgotten that the wtc had a sprinkler system. which worked. so, when the fires broke out, the sprinkler system was deployed and combustion temperatures were radically reduced. below a point where any weakening of structural steel would occur.

3. i continue to find it odd how so few relate the history of the buildings. i don't have my history of the buildings handy - it is in my library warehouse - but sometime immediately prior to completion, a fire broke out in one of the towers. at that time, there was no fire suppression system[no sprinklers]. if my recollection is accurate, the fire raged for 6 hours before it was extinguished. the after battle assessment of the damage was that no damage had occurred to the structural steel[and by the way, this fire occurred before the steel was coated with anything].

though the port of new york authority had been willing to allow the construction of these buildings without fire suppression systems, after this, sprinkler systems were added.

ponder on that for a moment.

4. it is also my guess that this fire got the attention of the city of new york...which extrapolated that an uncontrolled fire might cause the collapse of the towers. since any such collapse would be irregular, since a toppling could take out st paul's, the millenium hotel, att's comm center for the financial district, and other wtc buildings, i think that along with the change order that added the fire suppression system a demolition system was imposed on the towers - so that if any catastrophe occurred that might cause them to topple so as to damage surrounding properties, they could be brought down so as to fall into their footprint.

xymphora scolds those that view the destruction of the towers as incidents of controlled demolition. his argument is that the charges could not have been installed at any time after the occupation of the towers. and that may be accurate.

the demolition charges were installed after that first fire. before the occupancy of the building. the capability of bring down those towers as the kingdome[or the projects in st louis] was in place decades before 11/09/01.

to be continued.......

AMERIKA

what is it about the amerikan media? all controlled by the state? all controlled by zionists?

in the purportedly "legitimate" press[newspapers, television, radio], you will never encounter any truths about the events of 11/09/01.

what you will read, hear, see are artfully crafted fictions.

i have written about some of these fictions extensively. and i may still have some of those essays on a portable hard drive. but i doubt it. i think i had not saved some prior to a major hard drive crash. sigh.

on the other hand, "get me rewrite!"

i want to begin by saying that i do not understand how so many people are unable to cerebrate. and how many accept as truth what the state says.

let us consider just a few of the ways that should cause a sentient individual to question the lies of the state concerning the events of 11/09/01. where to begin? the beginning.......

1. consider a group of earnest terrorists. dedicated to the destruction of the great satan. they have had long-term relations with amerikan intell services. they have family members, and financiers, with long-term relations with the usa. in fact, some of them may have been trained at nas pensacola.

and as danny hopsicker has reported, atta was quite the playboy in venice, florida. and his instructor-employer must have been very well connected to have been caught running lots of cocaine and escaped prosecution. this is an interesting history of atta. principally because the nyt owns the local paper and refrained from doing any investigation into this story[this is the zionist/amerikan intell link - pinch'es dad, punch, was oss and a perfervid zionist]. it should be a matter of great concern to amerikan citizens how the concentration of media ownership allows for the "spiking" of important stories.

anyway, if you were as connected as atta, even marginally as well bank-rolled by the saudis, the mossad, you would never hijack a commercial airliner. you would never accommodate the variable of being denied access to a flight. you would never jeopardize your mission by making a connection. and you would never jeopardize your mission by flying for hours to your target - why would you think that you wouldn't be intercepted and exterminated?

the only reason for the fiction of the hijack story is so that the new amerikan gestapo can monitor/control airline-train travel within the usa. and the devolved/devolving citizenry accepts the imposition of the new totalitarianism.

it must be said: if there were real terrorists, they would never have used hijacking as a part of their scheme. they would have preferred to eliminate the variables. they would have acquired/leased 727's, DC10's. very affordable and very available in 2001. no one would have asked any questions.

they would have rented a hanger at some airport. they would have established a dba as an aircraft customizer. they would have acquired the planes. then loaded them with explosives. and flown them into teterboro, newark on 10/09/01. and if they wanted the WTC, they would have launched and within minutes collided with them. this would have prevented any interception. and would have insured destruction.

but, the question must be raised? why the wtc? this is not a strategic target. it is much like pearl harbor, which was also not a strategic target.

you know, if you were a real terrorist who wanted to injure the great satan, and you had the ability to acquire aircraft and fly them into strategic targets, you would fly them into indian point nuclear power plant and the exxon refinery in linden, nj. that would have shut down the usa. the rupture of the containment of indian point would have been tantamount to chernobyl - vast numbers of deaths from radioactivity and the shut-down of most of the northeast. why would you screw around with the wtc when you could impose that strategic damage?

and you would fly them into the exxon refinery just a few miles further south.

doing these things would have shut-down, destroyed the amerikan east coast.

even if you were foolish enough to energize your plan by incorporating hijackings, if successful in taking control of the airliners, why would you overfly indian point, fail to fly a little bit further south so as to strike exxon's refinery,
and strike a non-strategic target?

recognizing this is the first key to recognizing that the events of that day were part of a usg coup.

2. there is much talk about jet A[kerosene] fires so weakening the structural steel of the towers that they collapsed as if victims of a controlled demolition.

much erroneous information has been foisted on the populace concerning the fires. i have seen so much nonsense. i read somewhere that jet A burns at 1250 F. it doesn't. 850 F.

but more to the point, for those that squirm to defend the bushit version of the day, it should not be forgotten that the wtc had a sprinkler system. which worked. so, when the fires broke out, the sprinkler system was deployed and combustion temperatures were radically reduced. below a point where any weakening of structural steel would occur.

3. i continue to find it odd how so few relate the history of the buildings. i don't have my history of the buildings handy - it is in my library warehouse - but sometime immediately prior to completion, a fire broke out in one of the towers. at that time, there was no fire suppression system[no sprinklers]. if my recollection is accurate, the fire raged for 6 hours before it was extinguished. the after battle assessment of the damage was that no damage had occurred to the structural steel[and by the way, this fire occurred before the steel was coated with anything].

though the port of new york authority had been willing to allow the construction of these buildings without fire suppression systems, after this, sprinkler systems were added.

ponder on that for a moment.

4. it is also my guess that this fire got the attention of the city of new york...which extrapolated that an uncontrolled fire might cause the collapse of the towers. since any such collapse would be irregular, since a toppling could take out st paul's, the millenium hotel, att's comm center for the financial district, and other wtc buildings, i think that along with the change order that added the fire suppression system a demolition system was imposed on the towers - so that if any catastrophe occurred that might cause them to topple so as to damage surrounding properties, they could be brought down so as to fall into their footprint.

xymphora scolds those that view the destruction of the towers as incidents of controlled demolition. his argument is that the charges could not have been installed at any time after the occupation of the towers. and that may be accurate.

the demolition charges were installed after that first fire. before the occupancy of the building. the capability of bring down those towers as the kingdome[or the projects in st louis] was in place decades before 11/09/01.

to be continued.......

11/09/01

what is it about the amerikan media? all controlled by the state? all controlled by zionists?

in the purportedly "legitimate" press[newspapers, television, radio], you will never encounter any truths about the events of 11/09/01.

what you will read, hear, see are artfully crafted fictions.

i have written about some of these fictions extensively. and i may still have some of those essays on a portable hard drive. but i doubt it. i think i had not saved some prior to a major hard drive crash. sigh.

on the other hand, "get me rewrite!"

i want to begin by saying that i do not understand how so many people are unable to cerebrate. and how many accept as truth what the state says.

let us consider just a few of the ways that should cause a sentient individual to question the lies of the state concerning the events of 11/09/01. where to begin? the beginning.......

1. consider a group of earnest terrorists. dedicated to the destruction of the great satan. they have had long-term relations with amerikan intell services. they have family members, and financiers, with long-term relations with the usa. in fact, some of them may have been trained at nas pensacola.

and as danny hopsicker has reported, atta was quite the playboy in venice, florida. and his instructor-employer must have been very well connected to have been caught running lots of cocaine and escaped prosecution. this is an interesting history of atta. principally because the nyt owns the local paper and refrained from doing any investigation into this story[this is the zionist/amerikan intell link - pinch'es dad, punch, was oss and a perfervid zionist]. it should be a matter of great concern to amerikan citizens how the concentration of media ownership allows for the "spiking" of important stories.

anyway, if you were as connected as atta, even marginally as well bank-rolled by the saudis, the mossad, you would never hijack a commercial airliner. you would never accommodate the variable of being denied access to a flight. you would never jeopardize your mission by making a connection. and you would never jeopardize your mission by flying for hours to your target - why would you think that you wouldn't be intercepted and exterminated?

the only reason for the fiction of the hijack story is so that the new amerikan gestapo can monitor/control airline-train travel within the usa. and the devolved/devolving citizenry accepts the imposition of the new totalitarianism.

it must be said: if there were real terrorists, they would never have used hijacking as a part of their scheme. they would have preferred to eliminate the variables. they would have acquired/leased 727's, DC10's. very affordable and very available in 2001. no one would have asked any questions.

they would have rented a hanger at some airport. they would have established a dba as an aircraft customizer. they would have acquired the planes. then loaded them with explosives. and flown them into teterboro, newark on 10/09/01. and if they wanted the WTC, they would have launched and within minutes collided with them. this would have prevented any interception. and would have insured destruction.

but, the question must be raised? why the wtc? this is not a strategic target. it is much like pearl harbor, which was also not a strategic target.

you know, if you were a real terrorist who wanted to injure the great satan, and you had the ability to acquire aircraft and fly them into strategic targets, you would fly them into indian point nuclear power plant and the exxon refinery in linden, nj. that would have shut down the usa. the rupture of the containment of indian point would have been tantamount to chernobyl - vast numbers of deaths from radioactivity and the shut-down of most of the northeast. why would you screw around with the wtc when you could impose that strategic damage?

and you would fly them into the exxon refinery just a few miles further south.

doing these things would have shut-down, destroyed the amerikan east coast.

even if you were foolish enough to energize your plan by incorporating hijackings, if successful in taking control of the airliners, why would you overfly indian point, fail to fly a little bit further south so as to strike exxon's refinery,
and strike a non-strategic target?

recognizing this is the first key to recognizing that the events of that day were part of a usg coup.

2. there is much talk about jet A[kerosene] fires so weakening the structural steel of the towers that they collapsed as if victims of a controlled demolition.

much erroneous information has been foisted on the populace concerning the fires. i have seen so much nonsense. i read somewhere that jet A burns at 1250 F. it doesn't. 850 F.

but more to the point, for those that squirm to defend the bushit version of the day, it should not be forgotten that the wtc had a sprinkler system. which worked. so, when the fires broke out, the sprinkler system was deployed and combustion temperatures were radically reduced. below a point where any weakening of structural steel would occur.

3. i continue to find it odd how so few relate the history of the buildings. i don't have my history of the buildings handy - it is in my library warehouse - but sometime immediately prior to completion, a fire broke out in one of the towers. at that time, there was no fire suppression system[no sprinklers]. if my recollection is accurate, the fire raged for 6 hours before it was extinguished. the after battle assessment of the damage was that no damage had occurred to the structural steel[and by the way, this fire occurred before the steel was coated with anything].

though the port of new york authority had been willing to allow the construction of these buildings without fire suppression systems, after this, sprinkler systems were added.

ponder on that for a moment.

4. it is also my guess that this fire got the attention of the city of new york...which extrapolated that an uncontrolled fire might cause the collapse of the towers. since any such collapse would be irregular, since a toppling could take out st paul's, the millenium hotel, att's comm center for the financial district, and other wtc buildings, i think that along with the change order that added the fire suppression system a demolition system was imposed on the towers - so that if any catastrophe occurred that might cause them to topple so as to damage surrounding properties, they could be brought down so as to fall into their footprint.

xymphora scolds those that view the destruction of the towers as incidents of controlled demolition. his argument is that the charges could not have been installed at any time after the occupation of the towers. and that may be accurate.

the demolition charges were installed after that first fire. before the occupancy of the building. the capability of bring down those towers as the kingdome[or the projects in st louis] was in place decades before 11/09/01.

to be continued.......

VICTOR JARA

after they seized him, and spirited him off to the villa grimaldi, they broke his fingers.

so that he could never play his guitar again.

still, victor could sing. and sing he continued to do. for that singing, the amerikan surrogates killed him.

do you know the singing of victor jara? his anti-fascism?

do you know how the nixon/kissinger regime killed freedom in chile?

if you viewed MISSING, did you understand it?

do you forget the date of that amerikan-engineered coup?

if you do, let me remind you, 11/09/73.

do you know of the war profiteer, carlos cardoen? the man who functioned as a cut-out for the usa. manufacturing the cluster bombs that the usa would not sell.

to the israelis for instance. do you recall the images of amerikan-supplied f16's dropping cardoen-manufactured cluster bombs on beirut? probably not. those images were never aired in the usa.

or how about the cardoen cluster bombs being sold to iran, iraq.

or better still, suharto's indonesia. deployed in east timor, kalimantan, sumatra.

warm and fuzzy, now?

still a supporter of this evil empire?

MEXICAN BULLSHIT

so odd. banned from sites. and not even a troll.

i figure that demtillians must hate to hear truths.

here are some truths from a friend trying to work in mexico...

enjoy.

"You remember I spent five years working in Mexico.

I worked under a tourist Visa for three months and could legally renew it for three more months. After that you were working Illegally. I was technically illegal for three weeks waiting on the FM3 approval

During that six months our Mexican and US Attorneys were working to secure a permanent work visa called a FM3. It was in addition to my US passport that I had to show each time I entered and left the country. Barbara's was the same except hers did not permit her to work.

To apply for the FM3 I needed to submit the following notarized originals
(not copies) of my:

1. Birth certificate for Barbara and I.

2. Marriage certificate.

3. High school transcripts and proof of graduation.

4. College transcripts for every college I attended and proof of graduation.

5. Two letters of recommendation from supervisors I had worked for at least one year.

6. A letter from The ST. Louis Chief of Police indication I had no arrest record in the US and no outstanding warrants and was "a citizen in good standing."

7. Finally; I had to write a letter about myself that clearly stated why there was no Mexican Citizen with my skills and why my skills were important to Mexico. We called it our "I am the greatest person on Earth" letter. It was fun to write.

All of the above were in English that had to be translated into Spanish and be certified as legal translations and our signatures notarized. It produced a folder about 1.5 inches thick with English on the left side and Spanish on the right.

Once they were completed Barbara and I spent about five hours accompanied by a Mexican Attorney touring Mexican Government office locations and being photographed and fingerprinted at least three times. At each location and we remember at least four locations we instructed on Mexican tax, labor, housing, and criminal law and that we were required to obey their laws or face the consequences. We could not protest any of the Governments actions or we would be committing a felony. We paid out four thousand dollars in fees and bribes to complete the process. When this was done we could legally bring in our household goods that were held by US customs in Laredo Texas. This meant we has rented furniture in Mexico while awaiting our goods. There were extensive fees involved here that the company paid.

We could not buy a home and were required to rent at very high rates and under contract and compliance with Mexican law.

We were required to get a Mexican drivers license. This was an amazing process. The company arranged for the Licensing agency to come to our Headquarters location with their photography and finger print equipment and the laminating machine. We showed our US license, were photographed and fingerprinted again and issued the license instantly after paying out a six dollar fee. We did not take a written or driving test and never received instructions on the rules of the road. Our only instruction was never give a policeman your license if stopped and asked. We were instructed to hold it against the inside window away from his grasp. If he got his hands on it you would have to pay ransom to get it back.

We then had to pay and file Mexican income tax annually using the number of our FM3 as our ID number. The companies Mexican accountants did this for us and we just signed what they prepared. I was about twenty legal size pages annually.

The FM 3 was good for three years and renewable for two more after paying more fees.

Leaving the country meant turning in the FM# and certifying we were leaving no debts behind and no outstanding legal affairs (warrants, tickets or liens) before our household goods were released to customs.

It was a real adventure and If any of our Senators or Congressman went through it once they would have a different attitude toward Mexico.

The Mexican Government uses its vast military and police forces to keep its citizens intimidated and compliant. They never protest at their White house or government offices but do protest daily in front of the United States Embassy. The US embassy looks like a strongly reinforced fortress and during most protests the Mexican Military surround the block with their men standing shoulder to shoulder in full riot gear to protect the Embassy. These protests are never shown on US or Mexican TV. There is a large public park across the street where they do their protesting. Anything can cause a protest such as proposed law changes in California or Texas.

Please feel free to share this with everyone who thinks we are being hard on illegal immigrants."

A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF CANADIAN FASCISM

from today's prorev.

a report from the Toronto Star.....BUSH SEEKING TO PUT CANADIAN MILITARY UNDER U.S. CONTROL.

i suppose that this is the first chapter in the USA's seizure of canadian hydrocarbons.

a great idea. use the canadian military to steal the canadian assets.

but the canadian military hasn't been canadian for some years. just explore the canadian presence in haiti, even somalia.

completing your explorations, i think that you would have to conclude that canada has been less than an independent country for decades.